Archive for the ‘Female Supremacist Bullshit’ Category

Mystressworld is Revealed as a Scam

13 Comments

Mistress Roulette and I knew this was a scam from the get-go, but here’s a post from a Mystressworld insider revealing that the website had no intention of ever matching submissive men to dominant women. Instead, it was just looking to cash in on the fantasy. I’ve very proud of the controversial stance that Mistress Roulette took. It always feels good to be vindicated.

What follows is the entire text of what this Mistress wrote for those who want to read it. (more…)

Tags:

… I Rest My Case.

3 Comments

Thanks to the almighty gods of search engine optimisation, I’m #4 on the Google search for ‘Elise Sutton Femdom’. Rock on. A couple ahead of me, there’s another link: femaleledrelationships.com. It was talking about Sutton, so I checked it out. Not very positive. In fact, a lot of the postings on the forum seemed to be agreeing that Sutton is a ‘caricature’ and her website is ‘out of touch with reality’; written purely as ‘masturbatory fuel for neurotic male submissives’ and not at all geared toward its self-proclaimed target audience: female dominants.

But, wait! There’s more … (more…)

Tags: ,

Elise Sutton: ‘Freudian’ Femdom Fraud

26 Comments

Elise Sutton's Femdom Experience CoverJesus. This bitch can’t tell her id from her death instinct, and her website clearly needs to be put out of its misery. But let’s begin at the beginning, shall we?

So, here I am, wandering the web minding my own beeswax, when — lo and behold — I find yet another site on Female Supremacy. (Always in caps, mind. Forget proper sentence construction or grammatical correctness.) Fantastic. As if Mystressworld.com wasn’t enough of a blight on the whole of femdom, (plenty more on the madness of Mystress to come), now I’ve discovered Elise Sutton — who, evidently, has been around for a hell of a lot longer than a quack like her ever needed to be. Not to mention her ‘Psychoanalysis of the Submissive Male’ is inherently flawed on the basis alone of containing absolutely no psychoanalysis whatsoever. Can you do that? Write a piece about violins and title it: ‘A Theory of Baseball’? I was under the impression that it was faulty — not to mention just flat dumb. Of course, anyone with an actual degree in Psychology, (yours truly) can tell after 5 agonising seconds on this wacko’s website that this woman wouldn’t know an unconditioned stimulus if it bit her in her female supremacist ass.

For those of you who have not studied in the field of Psychology, psychoanalysis is very specific to the theories and practises first introduced by Freud — who very heavily believed in male supremacy based off of biology alone. Oh, I’m all for turning a field on its head and flipping it about. But you first have to have some idea of what you’re seeking to challenge. You want to break psychodynamic theory? Okay, then first, you need to learn it. Which, clearly, this cuckoo hasn’t.

This is not a difficult concept to grasp. (more…)

Tags: , , , , ,